Contact Me By Email


What To Do When You're Stopped By Police - The ACLU & Elon James White

What To Do When You're Stopped By Police - The ACLU & Elon James White

Know Anyone Who Thinks Racial Profiling Is Exaggerated? Watch This, And Tell Me When Your Jaw Drops.


This video clearly demonstrates how racist America is as a country and how far we have to go to become a country that is civilized and actually values equal justice. We must not rest until this goal is achieved. I do not want my great grandchildren to live in a country like we have today. I wish for them to live in a country where differences of race and culture are not ignored but valued as a part of what makes America great.

Monday, July 29, 2024

JD Vance went viral for ‘cat lady’ comments. The centuries-old trope has a long tail

JD Vance went viral for ‘cat lady’ comments. The centuries-old trope has a long tail

Edith Bouvier Beale at her home

Edith Bouvier Beale at her home "Grey Gardens" in January 1972 in New York. A 1975 documentary by that name explores the reclusive lives of Beale and her mother, living in their dilapidated house with over 50 cats.

Tom Wargacki/WireImage

“Republican vice presidential nominee Sen. JD Vance’s criticism of prominent Democrats as “childless cat ladies” has unleashed fury among women, with many now reclaiming the age-old sexist trope as a call to action this election season.

In a 2021 interview with Fox News host Tucker Carlson, then-Senate-candidate Vance complained that the U.S. was being run by Democrats, corporate oligarchs and "a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives and the choices that they've made and so they want to make the rest of the country miserable, too."

"It's just a basic fact — you look at Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, AOC — the entire future of the Democrats is controlled by people without children,” Vance continued. “And how does it make any sense that we've turned our country over to people who don't really have a direct stake in it?"

Sponsor Message

Video of the interview resurfaced on social media last week, as did an unrelated 2021 tweet in which Vance used the term “weird cat ladies” as an insult.

Vance was already facing scrutiny as former president Donald Trump’s newly minted running mate, in part for his stance on various family policies. He has called falling U.S. birth rates a “civilizational crisis,” and advocated in recent years that adults without children should pay higher taxes and have fewer voting rights.

And his cat lady comments — amplified online by Vice President Harris’ presidential campaign — did not land well, to say the least.

First, many took issue with the accuracy of his comments. Harris is the stepmother of two children, now in their 20s, who famously call her “Momala.”

Their biological mom, Kerstin Emhoff, has publicly decried the “baseless attacks” and credited Harris for being a “loving, nurturing, fiercely protective, and always present” co-parent over the last decade. Ella Emhoff, one of Emhoff’s daughters, also defended her stepmom in a post on social media, writing, “I love my three parents.”

And Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, whom Vance also name-checked, announced a month after that interview that he and his husband, Chasten, had become parents (to twins, we later learned).

Buttigieg told CNN last week that Vance made those comments “after Chasten and I had been through a fairly heartbreaking setback in our adoption journey.”

“He couldn’t have known that,” he added. “But maybe that’s why you shouldn’t be talking about other peoples’ children.”

Vance doubled down after backlash from both sides of the aisle

That sentiment was shared by many who were stung by Vance’s comments, including in the worlds of politics and entertainment.

Critics include former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, actor Whoopi Goldbergand TV personality Meghan McCain, who tweeted that Vance’s comments “caused real pain” and have been “activating women across all sides, including my most conservative Trump supporting friends.”

Even some conservative figures, like South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham and Fox News host Trey Gowdy, have publicly shaded Vance’s remarks.

Intended targets aside, many critics see the cat lady term as an insult to the growing number of women who don’t have kids, whether by choice or not.

Gun control activist and former Rep. Gabby Giffords, who survived an assassination attempt in 2011, tweeted that she and her husband, Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly — whose name has been floated as a potential VP candidate — were trying to have a baby through IVF “before I was shot and that dream was stolen from us.”

“To suggest we are somehow lesser is disgraceful,” Giffords added.

Actress Jennifer Aniston, who has spoken about her own fertility struggleswrote on social media that she hopes Vance’s daughter is lucky enough to bear children one day.

“I hope she will not need to turn to IVF as a second option,” Aniston wrote. “Because you are trying to take that away from her, too.”

Vance slammed Aniston’s remarks in an appearance on The Megyn Kelly Showon SiriusXM on Friday, saying they were “disgusting because my daughter is 2 years old” and that even if she did have fertility problems down the road, “I would try everything I could do try to help her because I believe families and babies are a good thing.”

Vance defended his comments on Kelly’s show, saying he was not criticizing people who don’t have children, but rather the Democratic Party for being “anti-family and anti-child.”

Vance’s comments are likely to alienate single women, who make up a sizable portion of the population and a key voting bloc (63% of unmarried women voted for President Biden in 2020). And that’s not to mention the millions of cat ownersacross the country.

Comedian Chelsea Handler, who does not have children, noted in a video response that even the nation’s founding president, George Washington, didn’t have biological kids (he also raised two stepchildren).

“I’d like to remind you that no president in the history of the United States has ever been a mother,” Handler added.

She vowed that “all us childless cat and dog ladies are going to go from childless and crushing it to childless and crushing you in November.”

Other social media users were quick to note that one of the world’s most famous self-described cat ladies, Taylor Swift, wields a ton of influence among the voting public — and has yet to endorse a 2024 candidate.

The long tail of the cat lady trope, explained

Vance is far from the first person to invoke the trope of the crazy cat lady. The insult has literally been leveled against childless women for centuries.

We know that ancient Egyptians appreciated cats as a source of companionship (including in the afterlife) and associated them with deities, most famously in the case of the feline goddess Bastet.

But cats’ reputation soured in the Middle Ages, as they were increasingly linked to paganism and witchcraft.

While many Europeans kept cats as pets, many others came to see them as sinister (perhaps due to their handling of mice, especially at night). Twelfth-century accounts offer descriptions of the devil transforming into a black cat and of heretical religious groups worshiping cats.

People increasingly came to believe that witches — in particular, women — had the ability to shape-shift into cats, or used them and other animal “familiars” to do their bidding.

Alice Kyteler, the first person condemned for witchcraft in Ireland, was accused during her 1324 trial of possessing an incubus that looked like a black cat. Agnes Waterhouse, believed to be the first English woman executed for witchcraft (in 1566), confessed that she had directed her pet cat — apparently named Satan — to kill local livestock.

That negative association with cats migrated to colonial America, where black cats were a feature of the late 17th-century Salem witch trials. But gradually, in their wake, the trope took on a somewhat softer tone.

“In the early 18th century, as the witch trials were widely recognized as a grave miscarriage of justice, single women with cats were suddenly transformed in the public eye from frightening fiends to figures to be pitied,” Rae Alexandra wrote for KQED in 2021.

The trope of the single woman and her association with cats really took off during the Victorian Era.

In Scotland, an 1880 edition of the Dundee Courier declared that “the old maid would not be typical of her class without the cat," and that "one cannot exist without the other,” according to the BBC.

“There is nothing at all surprising in the old maid choosing a cat as a household pet or companion,” the newspaper suggested. “Solitude is not congenial to human nature, and a poor forlorn female, shut up in a cheerless ‘garret,’ brooding all alone over her blighted hopes, would naturally centre her affections on some of the lower animals, and none would be more congenial as a pet and companion than a kindly purring pussy.”

One year later, in the U.S., Hart Ayrault wrote in Potter’s American Monthly — describing unmarried women as “having failed in the prime object of existence” — that “tradition associates her with cats and parrots, on which she is supposed to lavish all that is left of affection in her withered heart.”

A few decades later, as women began mobilizing to win the right to vote — both in the U.S. and the U.K. — they found cats used against them once again.

Cats — coded as passive and associated with the home, as opposed to more active, masculine dogs — became a symbol of anti-suffragist propaganda. Many cartoons showed men at home with kids and a cat, emasculated by women’s newfound ability to participate in politics.

But some suffragists, undeterred, sought to reclaim the cat.

In April 1916, Nell Richardson and Alice Burke embarked on a 10,000-mile road trip from New York to San Francisco. They drove their two-seater “Golden Flyer” across the country to advocate for women’s right to vote, and adopted a black cat along the way.

“The little black kitten is suffering as much as we are from the heat, but he keeps under a cover, and all we can see around the corner of it is a pink nose and a youthful whisker,” Burke wrote in her diary that spring, according to the National Park Service.

The cat, named Saxon after the manufacturer of their car, became their unofficial mascot — and still stands as a symbol of suffrage. The city of Mesquite, Nev., has held an annual “Saxon the Suffrage Cat” art contest for the last several years.

The cat lady stereotype has persisted too, further memorialized in mainstream popular culture with portrayals like the reclusive subjects of the 1975 documentary Grey Gardens, Sigourney Weaver’s character in Alien (which many social media users have invoked in recent days), Eleanor Abernathy (aka Crazy Cat Lady) on The Simpsons, and the humorless, cat-loving Angela on The Office.

But, just like a century ago, feminists have increasingly sought to reclaim the title as their own. There’s plenty of crazy cat lady-themed merchandise online, and now some of it is get-out-the-vote themed.“

Biden Announces His THREE Reforms To The SUPREME COURT

Biden to Call for Changes to Supreme Court During Austin Visit - The New York Times

Biden to Call for Changes to Supreme Court During Austin Visit

"In his first public engagement since ending his campaign, President Biden will propose overhauling a court that has become increasingly politicized and subject to ethics complaints.

President Biden, wearing sunglasses and a blue suit, holding a hat in one hand and pointing with the other, with trees and grass in the background.
President Biden is expected to argue that the current system of lifetime appointments for Supreme Court justices gives a president undue influence for decades.Pete Marovich for The New York Times

By Katie Rogers

Katie Rogers covers the White House and reported from Austin, Texas.

President Biden is expected to deliver remarks on Monday pushing for legislation that would bring major changes to the Supreme Court, including imposing term limits and creating an enforceable code of ethics on the justices.

The president is scheduled to speak at the Lyndon B. Johnson Presidential Library and Museum in Austin, Texas, his first public engagement since announcing his decision to end his presidential campaign last week. His speech will commemorate the 60th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act and propose overhauling the court, an effort that requires congressional approval and has little hope of gaining traction in a Republican-controlled House and a divided Senate.

The White House said in a fact sheet that Vice President Kamala Harris, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, also supported the changes Mr. Biden would outline in his remarks.

Mr. Biden is expected to argue that the current system of lifetime appointments for Supreme Court justices gives a president undue influence for decades. He will propose a process in which a president would appoint a justice every two years to spend 18 years on the bench.

Mr. Biden supports a code of conduct that would require justices to disclose gifts, refrain from public political activity and recuse themselves from cases in which they or their spouses have financial or other conflicts of interest, according to the plan the White House laid out.

He will also call for a constitutional amendment that could limit the broad presidential immunity that the court’s 6-to-3 conservative majority backed at the end of its term last month. That amendment would state that the Constitution does not confer any immunity from federal criminal indictment, trial, conviction or sentencing by virtue of previously serving as president, the White House said.

Mr. Biden has been discussing the proposals with constitutional scholars in recent months, and he had been inching toward announcing them when he ended his campaign. Progressives have urged him to move to limit the power of justices on the court, but he has not yet called for major changes.

A commission that Mr. Biden created in 2021 to examine the issues did not make specific recommendations, and he did not take any action. Since then, the Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. Wade, blocked gun control measures, eliminated affirmative action in college admissions, eroded its adherence to legal precedents and diminished L.G.B.T.Q. rights.

Mr. Biden has called the court’s immunity ruling a “dangerous precedent” that means “that there are virtually no limits on what a president can do.” But a constitutional amendment limiting that decision would face challenges, requiring two-thirds votes in Congress or at a convention called for by two-thirds of the states, followed by ratification by three-fourths of the state legislatures.

“I’m going to need your help on the Supreme Court, because I’m about to come out,” Mr. Biden said in a virtual meeting with members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus this month. “I don’t want to prematurely announce it, but I’m about to come out with a major initiative on limiting the court and what we do.”

He added, “I’ve been working with constitutional scholars for the last three months, and I need some help.”

Former President Donald J. Trump, the Republican nominee, denounced Mr. Biden’s ideas on social media this month, accusing him and Democrats of “desperately trying to ‘Play the Ref’ by calling for an illegal and unConstitutional attack on our SACRED United States Supreme Court.”

Mr. Biden’s appearance in Austin will be another opportunity for him to explain his decision to withdraw from the presidential race and endorse Ms. Harris, whose campaign has raised more than $200 million and garnered widespread support from the Democratic Party in a week.

“It gives us a really remarkable opportunity to see the president up close, to hear what he has to say about that decision, to hear what he has to say about the race that is going to unfold between now and November,” Mark A. Lawrence, the director of the Lyndon B. Johnson Presidential Library and Museum, told an ABC affiliate in Texas on Sunday.

Adding to the historic significance is Mr. Biden’s choice of venue for his first public engagement since leaving the race. Mr. Johnson was the last Democratic president to announce during an election year that he would not seek re-election.

Michael D. Shear contributed reporting.

Katie Rogers is a White House correspondent. For much of the past decade, she has focused on features about the presidency, the first family, and life in Washington, in addition to covering a range of domestic and foreign policy issues. She is the author of a book on first ladies. More about Katie Rogers"

Biden to Call for Changes to Supreme Court During Austin Visit - The New York Times

Saturday, July 27, 2024

Jasmine Crockett Gives Jim Jordan a Legal Lesson He'll NEVER Forget

‘I can’t justify this military operation any more’: the IDF reservists refusing to return to Gaza | Israel | The Guardian

‘I can’t justify this military operation any more’: the IDF reservists refusing to return to Gaza

"Three Israeli reserve soldiers who fought in the war against Hamas say why they no longer want to be part of military

Israeli army reservists Yuval Green, Tal Vardi and Michael Ofer Ziv have revealed their reasons for not returning to military service in Gaza.
Israeli army reservists Yuval Green, Tal Vardi and Michael Ofer Ziv have revealed their reasons for not returning to military service in Gaza. Photograph: Quique Kierszenbaum/The Observer

For Israeli military paramedic Yuval Green, it was the command to burn down a house that made him decide to end his reserve duty.

Green had spent 50 days in the southern Gaza city of Khan Younis earlier this year with his paratrooper unit, sleeping in a home lit only by battery-powered fairy lights among the rubble and devastation.

He had begun to have doubts about the unit’s purpose there months earlier when he heard about Israel’s refusal to agree to Hamas’s demands to end the war, along with freeing hostages.

Green is one of three Israeli reservists who told the Observer they will not return if called for military service in Gaza. All three previously undertook compulsory military service in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), which forms the backbone of society.

They returned after the 7 October attacks by Hamas militants, when almost 1,200 people were killed in towns and kibbutzim around Gaza and about 250 taken hostage.

But the destructive behaviour Green says he witnessed from other soldiers only fuelled the misgivings that he carried into Gaza, despairing at what he describes as a cycle of violence. He said he had stayed out of a sense of duty to care for those in his unit, who he knew from his years of compulsory military service. They were angry after seeing the devastation wreaked by Hamas’s attacks on Israeli towns, he added.

Two soldiers standing next to a miltary vehicle in the background and another soldier with an assault rifle in the foreground
Israel Defense Forces reservist soldiers securing roads in southern Israel. Photograph: Ori Aviram/Middle East Images/AFP/Getty Images

“I saw soldiers graffiting houses or stealing all the time. They would go into a house for a military reason, looking for weapons, but it was more fun to look for souvenirs – they had a thing for necklaces with Arabic writing that they collected.”

Then, early this year, he said: “We were given an order. We were inside a house and our commander ordered us to burn it down.”

When he raised the issue with the head of his company, he added: “The answers he gave me were not good enough. I said: ‘If we’re doing all of this for no reason, I’m not going to participate.’ I left the next day.”

The IDF’s response to the 7 October attacks has become Israel’s longest war since 1948 and one that has now killed more than 39,000 people in Gaza. Thousands more are believed buried beneath the rubble, with at least 90,000 wounded and the overwhelming majority of its 2.3 million population displaced. Meanwhile, observers fear the fighting risks spilling over into Lebanon.

Two of the reservists said they could feel compelled to return to service if the near daily exchange of drone attacks, airstrikes and artillery fire between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon becomes a fully fledged war.

People standing in a street filled with cars and other vehicles amid the ruins of bombed-out  buildings
Palestinians flee the southern city of Khan Yunis last week after a new evacuation order was issued by Israel Defense Forces. Photograph: Haitham Imad/EPA

All three cite different motivations for their decision not to serve in Gaza again, from how the Israeli military is conducting the war to the government’s reluctance to agree to a hostage deal, which offers an end to the fighting.

The three reserve soldiers speaking publicly about their unwillingness to return to service represent a minority, in part because military refusal in Israel is normally considered illegal.

Last month, 41 reserve soldiers signed an open letter declaring that they would no longer continue to serve in the IDF assault on Gaza’s southern city of Rafah.

“The half year in which we took part in the war effort has proven to us that military action alone will not bring the hostages home. Every day that passes endangers the lives of the hostages and the soldiers still in Gaza, and does not restore security to those living on the Gaza and northern borders,” they wrote.

An IDF spokesperson disagreed. “The IDF’s military pressure on Hamas has brought many hostages back home, as it has yesterday when five bodies were recovered by the IDF’s 98th Division,” they said last Thursday.

“The IDF operates according to the law regarding serving in the IDF and the assignment of troops to their duties. Each case of refusal to comply with the duty is assessed considering the relevant circumstances.”

Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has pledged to achieve “total victory” in Gaza, arguing that only military pressure will force Hamas to agree to a hostage deal.

“Any reasonable person can see that the military presence is not helping to bring the hostages back,” said civics teacher Tal Vardi, who trained reserve tank operators in northern Israel during his recent time back in the military.

“So if we’re not bringing back the hostages, all this is doing is causing more death on our side or the Palestinian side … I can’t justify this military operation any more. I’m unwilling to be part of a military that’s doing this,” he said.

“If anything, some of these operations have endangered the hostages, and the army has also killed some by mistake,” he said, pointing to an incident last December, when Israeli forces shot dead three hostages in Gaza who approached them waving white flags, in what the IDF said was a case of mistaken identity.

“It was bound to happen,” said reservist Michael Ofer Ziv, who said the incident provoked in him a powerful sense that once he finished his military service on the Gaza border, he would not return. The incident for him symbolised an overall lack of care and he was concerned by a system where mistakes such as this could occur.

Ziv returned to the IDF days after the October attacks to serve as an operations officer, requiring him to spend long hours staring at screens showing a live drone feed of footage from a small section of the enclave. This meant days at a time observing daily Palestinian life, watching as stray dogs or cars crossed bombed-out streets.

“Suddenly, you see a building go up, or a car you’ve been following for an hour suddenly disappear into a cloud of smoke. It feels unreal,” he said. “Some were happy to see this, as it meant seeing us destroy Gaza.”

When ground troops from his unit entered the enclave, his role was to track their movements and activities for support, as well as requesting targets for airstrikes.

“We almost always got approval to shoot,” he said. The approval process with the air forces, he added, “was mainly bureaucracy”.

He was also dismayed at what he described as a lack of clarity for soldiers regarding the rules of engagement, which he said were far more explicit during his compulsory military service, and felt the rules during this war were far looser than anything he previously experienced.

“After they shot the three hostages last December, I tried to remember if I ever saw a document like this – I was supposed to,” he said. “I was sure there was a briefing to the soldiers, but without having any documents to lean on, it’s unclear what people understood.”

An IDF spokesperson denied allegations relating to lax rules of engagement. “The IDF provides extensive training to its soldiers on them and how to act accordingly,” they said. “Additionally, before each military operation, soldiers receive a detailed briefing on the rules. Any accusation regarding the lack of written rules of engagement is completely false.”

Ziv recalled crying in the bathroom after his unit lost track of an injured Palestinian child at a checkpoint. Such things, he said, made him question his own role in the war and the overall purpose of the fighting.

The decision to invade Rafah rather than seal a hostage deal, he said, confirmed for him that he would not return to the military. When recently called upon to do so, he said, he told his commanding officer he could not come back.

“I came after 7 October as I felt like maybe they will rise to the occasion and use us in a way that could be of benefit. But I’m not willing to participate in this, as I don’t trust the government and what they’re trying to do.”

He added: “If something happens in the north, there’s a chance I’d go, but on other hand, I know what it might be like. I know what we did in Gaza – there’s no reason to believe we’d act any differently in Lebanon.”

‘I can’t justify this military operation any more’: the IDF reservists refusing to return to Gaza | Israel | The Guardian

Wave of Israeli airstrikes kills at least 50 people in Gaza | Israel-Gaza war | The Guardian

Wave of Israeli airstrikes kills at least 50 people in Gaza

"Palestinian officials say at least 30 killed in strike on school in Deir al-Balah where thousands were seeking shelter

Palestinians run for cover after an Israeli air strike on Khadija school leaves wreckage on the ground and the air filled with smoke
At least 30 Palestinians were said to have been killed in the Israeli strike on the Khadija school in Deir al-Balah.Photograph: Mohammed Saber/EPA

A wave of Israeli airstrikes targeting central and southern Gaza have killed at least 50 people and injured an estimated 200, with one strike hitting a school where thousands were seeking shelter.

Palestinian health ministry officials said at least 30 people were killed in an airstrike on the Khadija school in Deir al-Balah in the central Gaza Strip.

Wounded people poured into the nearby Aqsa hospital, while images from Deir al-Balah showed families carrying injured children for treatment.

The Associated Press reported that people searched the ruined classrooms for remains.

It said that close to the hospital where those killed in the strike were taken, its reporters witnessed people fleeing as an ambulance drove in the opposite direction. Inside the ambulance, it said, lay a dead toddler as well as another body shrouded in a blanket.

Deadly Israeli airstrike hits school in central Gaza – video report

Israeli forces also conducted strikes outside Gaza, including a drone strike on the Balata refugee camp near Nablus in the West Bank, killing one, after an Israeli soldier was wounded at a nearby checkpoint.

Israeli airstrikes on the southern Lebanese town of Kafr Kila reportedly killed four people, as militants in Lebanon responded with a barrage of rocket fire into Israeli territory.

Mediators from the Israeli intelligence service are expected to hold talks on Sunday in Rome with the head of the CIA, members of the Egyptian intelligence services and Qatari officials in an effort to spur a deal to return Israeli hostages held in Gaza as well as agree a ceasefire. Militants in Lebanon and Yemen have said they will halt their attacks if a ceasefire deal on Gaza is put in place.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said they targeted the Khadija school in Deir al-Balah in Gaza because the area was used as a “command and control complex” by Hamas militants.

They said “many steps were taken to reduce the chance of harming civilians”, including using precision weapons and intelligence. Tens of thousands of civilians have sought shelter in Deir al-Balah for months, crowding into every available piece of space after many were displaced several times from other parts of Gaza.

The strike in Deir al-Balah was accompanied by further strikes on Khan Younis, after a week of deadly fighting in Gaza’s second city. Strikes in Khan Younis killed at least 23 people and wounded 89, according to Palestinian health officials, as civilians were forcibly displaced from the city for the fourth day.

The IDF said a map demonstrating areas where civilians should seek shelter would be “adjusted” owing to the dangers associated with rockets fired towards Israeli territory as Hamas militants were present in a designated humanitarian area.

The IDF called on Palestinians in the south of Khan Younis to “temporarily evacuate” to a shrinking humanitarian zone in the coastal area of al-Mawasi, to where hundreds of thousands have fled in recent months after fighting in the southern city of Rafah as well as a renewed Israeli assault on Khan Younis.

“The early warning to civilians is being made in order to mitigate harm to the civilian population and keep civilians away from areas of combat,” it said.

The UN agency for Palestinian refugees, Unrwa, estimates that more than 80% of the Gaza Strip “has been placed under evacuation orders or designated as a no-go zone”, while many seeking shelter there describe being displaced upwards of five times. Israeli airstrikes have also targeted areas previously designated as safe.

The UN’s office for humanitarian affairs (OCHA) said earlier this week that evacuation orders in Khan Younis had been “issued in the context of ongoing attacks by the Israeli military and gave no time for civilians to know from which areas they were required to leave or where they should go”.

OCHA labelled these mass evacuation orders “confusing” and said Israeli forces had issued demands for civilians to flee while increasing their attacks on the same areas, as well as potential escape routes."

Wave of Israeli airstrikes kills at least 50 people in Gaza | Israel-Gaza war | The Guardian