I publish an "Editorial and Opinion Blog", Editorial and Opinion. My News Blog is @ News . I have a Jazz Blog @ Jazz and a Technology Blog @ Technology. My domain is Armwood.Com @ Armwood.Com.
What To Do When You're Stopped By Police - The ACLU & Elon James White
Know Anyone Who Thinks Racial Profiling Is Exaggerated? Watch This, And Tell Me When Your Jaw Drops.
This video clearly demonstrates how racist America is as a country and how far we have to go to become a country that is civilized and actually values equal justice. We must not rest until this goal is achieved. I do not want my great grandchildren to live in a country like we have today. I wish for them to live in a country where differences of race and culture are not ignored but valued as a part of what makes America great.
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
BBC News - China court 'accepts first HIV job discrimination case'
Saturday, August 21, 2010
What's Behind A Surge In Anti-Muslim Rhetoric? : NPR
This is a typical example of the ignorance and bigotry behind the opposition to the mosque in downtown New York City. These ignorant bigots and the political opportunists who support and inflame them the are both unpatriotic and they are playing into the hands of our terrorist enemies. They should read our constitution and learn the history behind our First Amendment to that constitution. The negative attitudes reflected in this story remind me of the same attitudes reflected during the Civil Rights movement. I was spat on by people like these when I was part of the integration of New York City Schools. Bigots are un-American and must be opposed.
John H. Armwood
Related articles by Zemanta
- Anti-Islam Protest in U.S. Bolsters Extremists, Experts Say - NYTimes.com (armwood.blogspot.com)
- Imam Behind NYC Islamic Center Absent Amid Debate : NPR (armwood.blogspot.com)
- NYT: U.S. anti-Islam protest seen as lift for extremists (msnbc.msn.com)
- 'Ground Zero Mosque': Latest In A Litany Of Killer Phrases : Watching Washington : NPR (armwood.blogspot.com)
- Imam Behind NYC Islamic Center Absent Amid Debate : NPR (armwoodnews.blogspot.com)
Thursday, August 19, 2010
BBC News - Wikileaks encryption use offers 'legal challenge'
Related articles by Zemanta
- Army Broadens Inquiry Into Disclosure of Reports to WikiLeaks (nytimes.com)
- Wikileaks draws criticism, censorship threats (news.cnet.com)
- WikiLeaks Secret Records Dump Stays in Legal Clear: Ann Woolner - Bloomberg (armwood.blogspot.com)
Friday, August 13, 2010
Reporters' Roundtable: Net neutrality | Reporters' Roundtable Podcast - CNET Blogs
That's the fundamental argument over Net neutrality, and there are some interesting specifics being added to the dialogue. Most recently, Google and Verizon produced what the two companies want to serve as a framework for Net neutrality going forward. AT&T has endorsed this proposal. Facebook has come out against it.
Today we're going to talk about these developments, and look at Net neutrality overall. How we got to where we are, where we're going, and who the actors are in the debate.
My guests today are two regular writers on the topic. First, here in the studio, Larry Downes, a well-known writer and thinker about emerging technology and policy issues. He's the author of the books "Laws of Disruption" and "Unleashing the Killer App," and writes frequently on CNET as well as on other publications about Net neutrality.
Joining us from our New York bureau is CNET writer Maggie Reardon. Maggie reports regularly on telecommunications policy and technology issues for CNET, and was on our show most recently about a month ago when we were discussing the iPhone 4 antenna issues.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Facebook differs with Google on Net neutrality | The Social - CNET News (armwoodlaw.blogspot.com)
- Google defends Net neutrality proposal (news.cnet.com)
- Net neutrality supporters to protest at Google HQ (macworld.com)
- Net neutrality protest planned at Google Friday (news.cnet.com)
- Google-Verizon Pact Proves Need for Real Net Neutrality (pcworld.com)
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
Facebook differs with Google on Net neutrality | The Social - CNET News
Related articles by Zemanta
- Google, Verizon net neutrality plan limits FCC (macworld.com)
- AT&T Wireless chief blesses Verizon-Google proposal (macworld.com)
- Net neutrality crusaders slam Verizon, Google (news.cnet.com)
Malaysia 1st women Islamic judges get equal powers - The China Post
Related articles by Zemanta
- Female judges for Shariah courts (channel4.com)
- Malaysia lawmaker escapes jail sentence for polygamy (newsinfo.inquirer.net)
- Malaysia appoints 1st female Islamic court judges (sfgate.com)
- Malaysia state chief encourages teen marriages (ctv.ca)
- Malaysia appoints 1st female Islamic court judges (ctv.ca)
Monday, August 09, 2010
Google And Verizon CEOs Unveil Proposed Net-Neutrality Policy : All Tech Considered : NPR
Google and Verizon announced Monday that the two companies had reached an agreement on a policy proposal surrounding net neutrality.
Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg.
In a conference call, Google CEO Eric Schmidt and Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg said the agreement lays out seven principles on how service providers can manage traffic.
The agreement states networks should be transparent about how they manage traffic and that they cannot degrade traffic or provide paid prioritization to any service on the public Internet. The policy does leave room for providers like Verizon to create "additional, differentiated online services."
Seidenberg explained that includes services like Verizon's FIOS TV or hypothetically could include something like a Metropolitan Opera 3D broadcast of a performance.
Some companies, he said, may not want to transmit something like that over the Internet, so they want the ability to be able to provide a differentiated service.
That said, Seidenberg added, these services could not be "designed to circumvent the rules."
Schmidt said that Google "loves the public Internet" and that neither Google nor any of its properties like YouTube would be providing any services outside of the public Internet.
What is net neutrality? Net neutrality is about preventing high-speed Internet providers from discriminating against certain sorts of providers or users of their network. For a hundred years, we've treated communications providers like sidewalks. The sidewalks can't choose between different walkers and have them travel at different speeds.
-- Alan Greenblatt
The big caveat in the proposed policy is that the Federal Communications Commission could enforce these rules only in the wireline world. Wireless broadband would be exempt from all the rules, except that the service providers would be required to be transparent about their network management.
In the conference call, Seidenberg said the two companies came to this proposal after conversations with FCC, including its chairman, and other service providers.
Verizon said is set to begin abiding by the policy proposal, even before the FCC takes any action.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Google, Verizon Pitch Neutrality Plan That Includes Tiered Option - PCWorld (pcworld.com)
- Net Neutrality Deal May Not See Wider Support (pcworld.com)
- Net Neutrality: Are Google and Verizon Waffling? (pcworld.com)
- Schmidt on Google Wave, Net neutrality (roundup) (news.cnet.com)
- Demystifying Google and Verizon's Proposed Policy for the Open Internet (mashable.com)
- FCC Calls off Net Neutrality Negotiations (pcworld.com)
Thursday, August 05, 2010
U.S. Court Overturns Calif. Same-Sex Marriage Ban - NYTimes.com
AN FRANCISCO — Saying that it unfairly targets gay men and women, a federal judge in San Francisco struck down California’s voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage on Wednesday, handing supporters of such unions a temporary victory in a legal battle that seems all but certain to be settled by the Supreme Court.
Wednesday’s decision is just the latest chapter of what is expected to be a long legal battle over the ban – Proposition 8, which was passed in 2008 with 52 percent of the vote.
Vaughn R. Walker, the chief judge of the Federal District Court in San Francisco, who heard the case without a jury, immediately stayed his decision pending appeals by proponents of Proposition 8, who confidently predicted that higher courts would be less accommodating than Judge Walker. But on Wednesday, at least, the winds seemed to be at the back of those who feel that marriage is not, as the voters of California and many other states feel, solely the province of a man and a woman.
"Proposition 8 cannot survive any level of scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause," wrote Mr. Walker. "Excluding same-sex couples from marriage is simply not rationally related to a legitimate state interest."
Related articles by Zemanta
- Judge overturns Calif. gay marriage ban (msnbc.msn.com)
- Judge Overturns Calif. Gay Marriage Ban (abcnews.go.com)
- California's Proposition 8 gay marriage ban overturned by court | Richard Adams (guardian.co.uk)
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. often borrowed the words of an abolitionist pastor from Boston named Theodore Parker, to inspire and give strength to those in the civil-rights movement. In the fight for full equality, both Dr. King and Rev. Parker reminded their flock that 'The arc of the moral universe is long...but it bends toward justice.'' This is a long overdue example of this phenomena.
John H. Armwood
Kagan Joins Supreme Court After 63-37 Vote in Senate - NYTimes.com
Related articles by Zemanta
- Senate Confirms Kagan (legaltimes.typepad.com)
- Senate Confirms Elena Kagan To Supreme Court (npr.org)
- Court Under Roberts Is Most Conservative in Decades - NYTimes.com (armwoodlaw.blogspot.com)
- Kagan avoids drama on way to court - POLITICO.com (armwood.blogspot.com)
- Committee Approves Kagan's Nomination to Supreme Court - The Caucus Blog - NYTimes.com (armwoodlaw.blogspot.com)
Wednesday, August 04, 2010
Kagan avoids drama on way to court - POLITICO.com Print View
Related articles by Zemanta
- Reid threatens cloture petition on Kagan vote (thehill.com)
- Senate debates high court nominee Elena Kagan (reuters.com)
- NRA Steps up Anti-Kagan Campaign (politics.usnews.com)
- Kagan Senate Debate Begins, Supreme Court Confirmation On Track (huffingtonpost.com)
- Court Under Roberts Is Most Conservative in Decades - NYTimes.com (armwood.blogspot.com)
After Afghan War Leaks, Revisions in a Shield Bill - NYTimes.com
WASHINGTON — Democratic senators who have been working on legislation providing greater protections to reporters who refuse to identify confidential sources are backpedaling from WikiLeaks, the Web site that recently disclosed more than 75,000 classified documents related to the Afghanistan war.
Senators Charles E. Schumer and Dianne Feinstein, Democrats of New York and California, are drafting an amendment to make clear that the bill’s protections extend only to traditional news-gathering activities and not to Web sites that serve as a conduit for the mass dissemination of secret documents. The so-called “media shield” bill is awaiting a vote on the Senate floor.
“WikiLeaks should not be spared in any way from the fullest prosecution possible under the law,” Mr. Schumer said in a statement. “Our bill already includes safeguards when a leak impacts national security, and it would never grant protection to a Web site like this one, but we will take this extra step to remove even a scintilla of doubt.”
The bill would allow reporters, when faced with subpoenas seeking to compel them to testify about their confidential sources, to ask a federal judge to quash the demand rather than fining or jailing them for contempt of court if they refuse to comply. About three dozen states have such a law for state courts.
Under the bill, federal judges would evaluate requests to quash a subpoena by balancing the public interest against the need to identify a source, providing different levels of protection depending on the nature of the case.
The information seeker would also have to exhaust all other means of obtaining the names before seeking a journalist’s testimony, though matters involving threats to national security would be exempted from some protections.
It is not clear whether WikiLeaks — a confederation of open-government advocates who solicit secret documents for publication — could be subject to a federal subpoena. Federal courts most likely do not have jurisdiction over it or a means to serve it with such a subpoena.
Moreover, WikiLeaks says that its Web site uses technology that makes it impossible to trace the source of documents that are submitted to it, so even if the organization were compelled to disclose a source, it is not clear that it would be able to do so.
Still, in case WikiLeaks or a similar organization sought to invoke a shield law, proponents of the legislation are trying to create legislative history that would show judges that Congress did not intend for the law to cover such organizations. The idea, aides said, would be to add language bolstering a section defining who would be covered by the law as a journalist — an area that can be tricky in an era of blogging and proliferation of online-only news media outlets.
Paul J. Boyle, senior vice president for public policy at the Newspaper Association of America — which supports the bill — said Senate aides had asked his group to consult on the proposed changes.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Army Broadens Inquiry Into WikiLeaks Disclosure - NYTimes.com (armwoodnews.blogspot.com)
- Afghan war leak may have severe consequences: Gates (reuters.com)
- You: Revisions Made in 'Media Shield' Bill (nytimes.com)
Monday, August 02, 2010
Wikileaks editor interrogated by US border police - Americas, World - The Independent
- "Any system of prior restraints of expression comes to this Court bearing a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity." Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58, 70 (1963); see also Near v. Minnesota,283 U.S. 697 (1931). The Government "thus carries a heavy burden of showing justification for the imposition of such a restraint." Organization for a Better Austin v. Keefe, 402 U.S. 415, 419 (1971). The District Court for the Southern District of New York in the New York Times case and the District Court for the District of Columbia and the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the Washington Post case held that the Government had not met that burden. We agree.
Related articles by Zemanta
- College Students Probed in Wikileaks Investigation (newser.com)
- Wikileaks draws criticism, censorship threats (news.cnet.com)
- WikiLeaks Secret Records Dump Stays in Legal Clear: Ann Woolner - Bloomberg (armwood.blogspot.com)
- Wikileaks researcher detained at border (zdnet.com)
Sunday, August 01, 2010
Judge 'inundated' with death threats after Arizona ruling :: CHICAGO SUN-TIMES :: Nation
Related articles by Zemanta
- Arizona Judge Susan Bolton Gets Death Threats After Immigration Ruling (oliverwillis.com)
- Arizona immigrant checks blocked (guardian.co.uk)
- Judge Blocks Key Parts of Immigration Law in Arizona - NYTimes.com (armwood.blogspot.com)
- Arizona immigration law: Susan Bolton's getting a lot of death threats (shortformblog.com)